Doing well with money is not about what you know, but how you behave. In finance can someone with no college degree, formal experience or connections and massively outperform another person with the best education, training and connections.
Example: The wealthy janitor vs the bankrupt MBA
Ronald Read, a humble janitor, died at the age of 92 with around $8 million. He hadn’t won the lottery or received a big inheritance. He’d just been a diligent saver and invested in blue chip stocks over a long time.
On the other hand, Richard Fuscone was a finance executive with a Harvard MBA, who seemed to have all the advantages Read didn’t. Fuscone had become so successful that he retired in his 40s to become a philanthropist. But he also spent big—his mansion cost more than $90,000 a month to maintain. He was bankrupted in the 2008 financial crisis.
Behaviour is greatly underrated and hard to teach, even to smart people.
You are a person with emotions. So don’t try to make the decisions that would be optimal for an emotionless robot, but which cause you to lose sleep at night. Aim for decisions that are just “reasonable”, which you can stick with in the long-run. A strategy that works in theory, but requires you to stick with it even if you lose 100% of your savings, is not reasonable.
Few people make financial decisions purely with a spreadsheet. They make them at the dinner table, or in a company meeting.— Morgan Housel in The Psychology of Money
It’s helpful to think of market volatility as a price or fee. High returns do not come for free—its price is high volatility and risk. You can pay this price by accepting the volatility, or you can find an asset with less risk and a lower pay-off. Trying to get high returns without the volatility (e.g. by timing the market) is like trying to steal a car. A few get away with it. But far more do not, and end up worse off. If you think of volatility as a fee, the trade-off is clearer and may be easier to stomach.